Nebraska Attorney Suspended for AI Use: What Your Ethical Decision Profile Reveals

# Nebraska Attorney Suspended for AI Use: What Your Ethical Decision Profile Reveals

> **Quick answer:** Nebraska attorney Greg Lake faces suspension after his Supreme Court brief contained 57 defective citations and 20 AI hallucinations — including a fabricated 2019 case that never existed. On April 9, 2026, the Nebraska Supreme Court referred him to the Counsel for Discipline for "failure of his duty of candor toward the court." Psychologist Albert Bandura's research on moral disengagement explains why smart professionals make this exact move, and your gut reaction to this story reveals which ethical decision profile you carry.

Nebraska attorney suspended for AI use is the news breaking across legal circles right now — but the psychology story underneath it is the one nobody else is telling. When you learn that Greg Lake submitted 57 defective citations to his state's highest court and then denied using AI at all, what's the first thing you feel? Outrage? Sympathy? A quiet, uncomfortable "I get it"? That reaction tells you more about your own ethical wiring than almost any quiz could.

## What Happened: Nebraska Attorney Faces Suspension After AI Brief

On April 9, 2026, the Nebraska Supreme Court referred Omaha attorney Greg Lake of Plains Legal Group to the state's Counsel for Discipline — the formal step that puts his law license in jeopardy.

The case stems from a divorce appeal Lake filed on behalf of a husband disputing property division and child custody. His brief contained 63 references total. Of those, 57 were defective in some form. Among them: 20 cases the court called AI "hallucinations" — including a 2019 case, *Kennedy v. Kennedy*, cited for a point about parental custody. No such case exists. The quotes Lake attributed to it were invented.