Judges Using AI to Draft Rulings: What Sotomayor's Warning Reveals About Your Decision-Making Type

# Judges Using AI to Draft Rulings: What Sotomayor's Warning Reveals About Your Decision-Making Type

> **Quick answer:** Over 60% of judges now use AI tools to draft rulings or prepare for hearings, a new survey found. Justice Sonia Sotomayor responded in April 2026 by calling AI's ability to predict Supreme Court outcomes "a very bad thing" — proof, she said, that the Court is "way too predictable." Psychologists tie this kind of institutional predictability directly to a measurable personality trait, and your reaction to this story maps to one of four decision-making types.

Judges using AI to draft rulings has moved from experiment to mainstream in under two years. If your immediate reaction is alarm, relief, or something in between, that gut response is more diagnostic than you probably realize. How you process AI replacing human judgment in high-stakes institutions is a direct reflection of how YOU handle authority, fairness, and uncertainty in your own decision-making.

## Judges Using AI to Draft Rulings: What Happened

A new survey published in April 2026 found that more than 60% of judges have incorporated AI tools into their judicial work — a figure that has prompted concern from legal scholars and, now, from the Supreme Court itself.

Federal Judge Xavier Rodriguez of Texas described his process: he feeds case filings into an AI tool that generates a case timeline and a summary of claims, and in areas of law where he feels expert, he sometimes uses the AI to draft the ruling before issuing judgment.