SCOTUS 2025-26 Term Review: Landmark Rulings on Federal Power, Digital Privacy, and Elections

# SCOTUS 2025-26 Term Review: Landmark Rulings on Federal Power, Digital Privacy, and Elections

> **Quick answer:** The Supreme Court's 2025-26 term is one of the most consequential in decades. Already decided: *Learning Resources v. Trump* (6-3) struck down the president's IEEPA tariff authority, and *Louisiana v. Callais* (6-3) gutted the Voting Rights Act's redistricting protections. Still pending by late June: *Chatrie v. United States* on geofence warrants and *Watson v. RNC* on mail ballot deadlines — both of which will reshape digital privacy law and the 2026 midterm elections.

The SCOTUS 2025-2026 term review reads like a constitutional reckoning. In barely eight months, the Supreme Court has issued rulings that limit presidential economic power, redraw the boundaries of racial redistricting, and left unresolved questions about your phone's location data that will affect every American with a smartphone. With two blockbuster decisions still expected before the term closes in late June or early July 2026, the final tally could make this the Court's most impactful term since *Citizens United* in 2010.

*This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for legal matters.*

## The Term in Context: Why 2025-26 Is Different

Legal scholars track SCOTUS terms by the number of decisions that qualify as "generationally significant" — rulings that courts, agencies, and legislatures will cite for decades. By that measure, the 2025-26 term is already at three, with two more potentially on the way.